Monday, July 8, 2013

1920's Beaded Flapper Dress

"Beaded Gown of the Fabulous Roarin' Twenties
worn by Mrs. Wm. Schreiber"
The piece I felt the most urgent need to tackle was this 1920's beaded "Flapper" dress. It was displayed on one of the newer mannequins, which unfortunately had a bust far too big (almost a C cup!!) for the dress, causing a lot of stress damage and tears to the front of the dress. Also, because of the weight of the beads on the thin tissue-silk, the shoulder straps were riddled with tears and almost completely worn away, and the T-back strap had long since torn. Someone from the museum had used several large black ostrich plumes tucked into the front of the dress to conceal all of the shattering--sadly, this caused even more damage.


The T-back strap itself is pretty structurally sound, but the shoulders and side back are suffering seriously because of the too-perky-C-cup-syndrome of the modern-sized mannequin.
Neverevereverever display a beaded dress like this!! Beaded dresses aren't exempt from gravity! Also, don't stuff heavy objects into the shatters and tears!!
Yikes...irreparable damage, and a number of missing beads and rhinestones.
You can see how stretched taut across the bust this dress is on its inappropriate mannequin.
Here, you can see a long tear, also due to the mannequin.
My plan for this dress is to display it laying horizontally in a display case, with some relevant accessories tossed in there for context. Luckily, the director of the library, Mr. Josh Humphrey, had a nice wood case lying around, with an emerald felt lining. I thought it was the perfect canvas for this rather pale dress to "pop" (considering it doesn't really stand out on its mannequin...I guess you have to have a certain complexion to pull off this pale shade of beige!).

It was quite a task taking this dress of the mannequin. I knew it would be heavy, but I didn't anticipate it being as heavy as it was...it's a wonder the whole thing is (mostly) still intact, what with those pounds of beaded fringe dangling off the bottom. I barely breathed the whole time I was moving the dress, as it was so fragile.  I laid the dress onto two sheets of archival tissue paper. This will prevent the dress from absorbing any dirt or dyes from the green felt lining of the case. It also facilitates me moving around the dress to get it perfectly centered in the case.

A detail of the T-back construction.
Even these handsewn whip stitches aren't perfect. The T-back strap is faced with several pieces of what appears to be coordinating bias tape.
Here, you can really see how the fibers of the thin tissue-silk, through repeated wear and stress, shattered and disintegrated.
After I got the dress all straightened out on its tissue paper bed, I took 4 more slices of tissue paper and, with great maneuvering, slid them inside the dress through the bottom opening (which has suffered less structural damage than the top of the dress). With all this, the beaded fringe at the bottom of the dress had become terribly tangled, so I whipped out more tissue paper and began carefully separating each bejeweled strand.  After I had all the strands of fringe neatly lined up, I slid out the tissue paper and the fringe remained (relatively) neat and tidy.


To neaten up all that tissue paper still visible around the armscythes and neckline, I carefully snipped slits in the tissue paper, which helped me fold it under the neckline and armscythes. The final effect is really clean and sharp.

Into the case, I added the feather-and-jewel headband and long pearl necklace that were displayed on the mannequin with the dress. I also popped in a pair of white, elbow-length beaded gloves (which were previously displayed on the floor of the dais), and later, a blue (I believe celluloid) haircomb with paste jewels (not visible in the following pictures). I also added a paste-jewel brooch that was previously pinned onto the collar of an extremely faded c. 1905 wool bodice. The case still looked kind of empty, so I added in one non-historical piece: a stretchy beaded bracelet that was on the arm of a mannequin wearing a sequined 1950's dress. Regardless of non-historical accuracy, the bracelet helps visually fill out the space, and its colors coordinate with the rest of the display.

The feathered and jewel brooch headband, the pearl necklace, the paste-jewel brooch, and the stretchy bracelet.
Kind of difficult to see the detail of the beaded gloves. The gloves also have a layer of  protective tissue paper beneath them. "Gift of Ms. Ruth Magerheimer"

5 comments:

  1. So good to hear a story with a happy ending! And your display is well-balanced. Are you moving everything away from that skylight as well?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you! This display case isn't near the skylight (it's a really massive skylight, as big as the entire dais), but since the museum remains closed in the summer, I'm keeping the case covered in some pieces of parcel paper to protect from any potential rays.

      Delete
    2. As for the rest of the gowns, the museum committee is currently considering building a sort of structure or gazebo over the dais. But unfortunately, most of the damage has been done, as the dresses have been displayed under that skylight since the 1970's ):

      Delete
  2. Oh, it looks so much better like this! It does pop against the green background and it doesn't look so frayed and torn! The damage to such a lovely old piece really is awful! It is good to know it can still be appreciated!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi,
    Just wanted to let you know that it is okay to display beaded dresses on mannequins...only ones that are in good shape of course! Usually, the shoulders will be reinforced before the dress goes onto the mannequin, to give it more support. The general rule for textile displays is 3 to 6 months. After that, they need to "rest" and be changed out. I am a curator, and we are doing a 1920's exhibit with several beaded dresses. The exhibit runs for only two months, specifically to not stress the beaded dresses.
    In the case with your 1920's dress, you did the right thing, as it's not in very good shape :(

    ReplyDelete