Monday, August 5, 2013

1909-14 Silk Wedding Gown



Although donated by the same family that gave the 1870s green silk bustle gown to the Kearny Museum, this 1909-14 silk and lace wedding gown was improperly mislabeled as being part of the bride's trousseau in 1870. This wedding dress is as far from the 1870s as you could get...elbow length pleated sleeves, lace insets, pearl and rhinestone decoration, a slim, straight skirt with a slight train and a drapey swag of fabric. These elements coordinate with dresses from 1909-14.

Not only was this dress on the worst mannequin in the whole exhibit (the most crackly skin and weirdly hunched pose), the dress had suffered some kind of weird moisture damage, which left enormous, stiff stains and discoloration along the back of the dress, and mold on some of the lace.

To fit the mannequin, someone had sliced up each glove (a delicate beaded cotton style) and then taped it shut. And look just how dirty those gloves were! They were covered in murky brown stains.
The horror that awaited underneath the gloves.
The pitifully messy and discordant "bouquet" was distracting from the elegant style lines of the gown.
Beautiful sleeves, and beautiful bead and pearl trim!  Utterly scrumptious, but barely noticeable under that enormous piece of synthetic lace cloth that was draped to simulate the appearance of a veil.
The lace "veil" was the first warning sign of unimaginable grime and moisture damage.
The back of the gown. The awkward fit of the gown on a weirdly posed mannequin, combined with massive, dense moisture stains. This moisture most likely came from the enormous skylight overhead.
Mold on the fragile lace and silk.
Even more mold stains on the back of the skirt.
Where the silk had absorbed the moisture, it had dried up and become brittle to the touch, so much so that the fibers just snapped when I touched them to examine the damage.
The long folds of the ivory silk skirt couldn't escape from being permeated--and damaged--by this intense moisture.
The silk experienced some stress and consequently ripped after the thread holding the hem had rotted.
The biggest surprises in this "dress resurrection" were what I found when I removed the dress from the mannequin. The mannequin itself was nightmarishly horrifying; rather than an actual midsection, it had this weird concave midsection made of a mesh material that had also soaked up its fair share of whatever leaked through the skylight. The mannequin also wore a short Edwardian petticoat, which was terribly stained from--you guessed it--moisture damage. The silk lining of the dress fared the worst in terms of damage; it was completely shattered, with only a few threads holding down bones, hooks, and eyes.

Warning: The following images may not be suitable for children or those who are faint of heart.
GAHHH!! What is that?!?
All that water must've had soot or something in it, because the mannequin's neck--and the lace neck inset--were covered in this sooty grime.
The heartbreaking remnants of the silk lining.


This poor petticoat is in desperate need of a wash.
The wedding gown is constructed in one piece. It fastens along the left-hand side with hooks and eyes, as dresses of this period usually do. It fastens with more hooks and eyes around the front of the armscye, along the shoulder, and up the high lace collar. The lace collar still has it's original stays, though they were attached with tape. The decorative silk swag is attached at the left, swings across the waist, and is fastened at the right side seam. I couldn't get many photos of the inside because I wanted to handle this dress as little as possible.

The shoulder hook-and-eye closure.
The hook-and-eye closure along the lace collar.
The closure of the swag. And lovely decorative chainstitching!!
I decided that the best upgrade I could give it at the moment was to put it on one of those more modern mannequins, of which now I had a few naked ones lying around. This display is still by now means perfect (really due to the mannequin's awkward pose) but it still succeeds in highlighting the actual dress, instead of swamping it in layers of synthetic, dirty lace fabric and questionable styling choices.

However inaccurate the red hair is, it still helps this rather "ecru" side of the exhibit "pop."
The lovely decorative swag, in full view! The subtle train is supported by some pieces of balled-up acid-free tissue paper.
Those gorgeous sleeves are no longer smothered by that dingy lace tablecloth.
I used the veil from the 1926 Wedding Gown display to help conceal the stains on the back of the dress. I plan to replace the flower crown with a decent-looking tiara from Ebay.

3 comments:

  1. http://digitalgallery.nypl.org/nypldigital/dgkeysearchdetail.cfm?trg=1&strucID=700623&imageID=817851&total=15&num=0&word=brides%201909&s=1&notword=&d=&c=&f=&k=1&lWord=&lField=&sScope=&sLevel=&sLabel=&sort=&imgs=20&pos=3&e=w

    For the veil :-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi! You won the giveaway on Fed Up With Lunch! Please get into contact with me so I can mail you the books!
    Thanks,
    Sarah

    ReplyDelete